State v. Summers

trial court did not prejudicially err by admitting recorded statement that Defendant had previously shot his cousin; trial court did not plainly err in its limiting instruction to the jury; Defendant's challenge to the denial of his motion for appropriate relief dismissed because Defendant failed to appeal from the order

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

trial court did not prejudicially err by admitting recorded statement that Defendant had previously shot his cousin; trial court did not plainly err in its limiting instruction to the jury; Defendant's challenge to the denial of his motion for appropriate relief dismissed because Defendant failed to appeal from the order