Appellate Court Opinions

Slip opinions (court's decision in a case) filed and written by the justices of the Supreme Court or judges of the Court of Appeals

Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.

35,004 Appellate Court Opinions

, Court of Appeals , COA19-967 (Judge John Tyson) , Published
State v. Shuler

Trafficking in methamphetamine; right to silence; comment on defendant's silence; affirmative defense of duress; prior notice to State; State's case in chief.

, Court of Appeals , COA19-775 (Judge Reuben Young) , Unpublished
State v. Sprinkle-Surratt

Motion to Suppress, Motion to Dismiss, Freedom of Travel, Equal Protection, Valid Programmatic Purpose

, Court of Appeals , COA19-570 (Judge Chris Dillon) , Unpublished
State v. Thomas

indecent liberties, statutory sex offense, specific intent, voluntary intoxication, failure to testify, right to remain silent

, Court of Appeals , COA19-852 (Judge Allegra Collins) , Published
Valentine v. Solosko

service of process; trial court discretion to extend time for service; dormant summons; alias or pluries summons

, Court of Appeals , COA19-817 (Judge Phil Berger Jr.) , Unpublished
Yow v. Henry

Child custody, change of circumstances

, Supreme Court , 188A18-2 (Per Curiam) , Published
Banyan GW, LLC v. Wayne Preparatory Acad. Charter Sch., Inc.

Whether a contract's liquidated damages provision created a genuine issue of material fact, thereby precluding summary judgment for plaintiff and whether the contract with plaintiff was in violation of defendant's charter and the statutes governing its operation and is therefore null and void.

, Supreme Court , 369PA18 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

Whether the General Assembly intended to exempt by implication the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System's Board of Trustees from rulemaking requirements pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, N.C.G.S. 150B, in adopting a Contribution-Based Benefit Cap pursuant to N.C.G.S. 135-5(a3).

, Supreme Court , 273A19 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re B.C.B.

Appeal from an order terminating respondent's parental rights under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(7); willful abandonment.

, Supreme Court , 259A19 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re C.J.C.

Appointment of a guardian ad litem pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1108; whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining the best interests of the child.

, Supreme Court , 231A19 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re K.N.K.

Termination of parental rights; whether the trial court erred by concluding respondent willfully abandoned his child where respondent attended visitations with the child after the petition was filed; whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining the child's best interest.

, Supreme Court , 227A19 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re N.P.

Appeal from an order terminating respondent's parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1); neglect.

, Supreme Court , 150A19 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
In re S.D.

Appeal from an order terminating parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1) and (2); whether the trial court's adjudicatory findings of fact were supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence; and whether those findings were sufficient to support the trial court's conclusion of law that grounds existed to terminate respondent's parental rights on the basis of neglect based upon a prior adjudication of neglect and a likelihood of repetition of neglect.

, Supreme Court , 212A19 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re Z.A.M.

Appeal from an order terminating parental rights under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1) and (2); whether the trial court issued sufficient findings of fact regarding progress leading up to the termination hearing to support its ultimate findings of fact and conclusions of law that grounds existed to terminate parental rights; whether the trial court abused its discretion in terminating parental rights.

, Supreme Court , 339A18 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
New Hanover Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

Whether payments made pursuant to an agreement between the Attorney General's Office and major hog producers constitute 'penalties' subject to article IX, section 7 of the North Carolina Constitution.

, Supreme Court , 434PA18 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
PHG Asheville, LLC v. City of Asheville

Conditional Use Permits; Whether the City of Asheville properly denied a developer's application for a conditional use permit to build a hotel in downtown Asheville; Whether a local government may independently assess an application for a conditional use permit and make findings of fact that support denying that permit when no one offers evidence in opposition to that permit or, alternatively, whether a developer is automatically entitled to the issuance of a conditional use permit when no one presents evidence in opposition to the permit.