First degree murder, voluntary intoxication, motion to suppress, robbery with a dangerous weapon, 5th amendment, 8th amendment

plea arrangements; plea withdrawal

trial court did not prejudicially err by admitting recorded statement that Defendant had previously shot his cousin; trial court did not plainly err in its limiting instruction to the jury; Defendant's challenge to the denial of his motion for appropriate relief dismissed because Defendant failed to appeal from the order

assault; distinct interruption; multiple assault charges

sexual assault on a minor; expert testimony; witness credibility

DRE expert testimony; indications of impairment; driving while impaired.

Judgment on the pleadings; De novo; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 159-28; Preaudit certificate; Contract; Void; Sovereign immunity

OAH, Certificate of Need, State Medical Facility Plan

Whether the Administrative Law Judge properly affirmed the issuance of a permit, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 150B-34(a) (2021).

Whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence proffered by the defense which defendants asserted would tend to exculpate them in connection to the crimes for which defendants were being tried.

Evidence taken in the light most favorable to the State was sufficient to support the trial court's decision to instruct the jury on the aggressor doctrine even in circumstances involving the defense of habitation.

Whether defendant presented a prima facie case of selective enforcement.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant was not entitled to a new trial based on the trial court's decision to exclude evidence found on the victim's cell phone.

Whether defendant's capital trial and sentence of death were free of error or prejudicial error as regards defendant's motions for the trial judge to recuse himself or be disqualified and various evidentiary and jury selection issues.

Whether, under Delaware law, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing applies to plaintiffs' breach of contract claim. Whether the trial court erred in its holding regarding defendants' motion for summary judgment regarding breach of contract, misrepresentations within a letter of intent, misrepresentations regarding contract amendment, and the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Whether the trial court erred in its holdings on 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss regarding claims of fraud by omission, promissory fraud, fraud, fraudulent inducement, and negligent misrepresentation. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a party's request for leave to file a second amended complaint. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in a discovery order ruling under Business Court Rule 10.9. Whether claims alleging negligent misrepresentation must rise to the heightened pleading standard of Rule 9(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 60(b); standing; default judgment

municipal ordinance; zoning districts; land use; buffers; de novo; statutory interpretation

declaratory judgment; N.C.G.S. 100-2.1; protection of monuments, memorials, and works of art; Open Meetings Law; summary judgment; standing; mootness

Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.1, willful abandonment, N.C. Gen. Stat. 7B-1111(a)(7)

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(1), (2), (4), (6), and (7); alternative childcare arrangement