Appellate Court Opinions

Slip opinions (court's decision in a case) filed and written by the justices of the Supreme Court or judges of the Court of Appeals

Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.

33,077 Appellate Court Opinions

, Court of Appeals , COA23-836 (Judge Fred Gore) , Unpublished
State v. McDuffie

second-degree murder; lesser-included offense jury instruction; involuntary manslaughter

, Court of Appeals , COA23-541 (Judge Valerie Zachary) , Unpublished
State v. McNair

second-degree burglary; motion to dismiss; substantial evidence; reasonable inference; restitution; competent evidence

, Court of Appeals , COA23-977 (Judge April Wood) , Published
State v. McNeil

Possession; Constructive possession; Close juxtaposition; Controlled delivery; Power to control; Lesser-included offense; Methamphetamine; Other incriminating circumstances; Motion to dismiss.

, Court of Appeals , COA23-409 (Judge Chris Dillon) , Published
State v. Montanino

felony murder, felonious larceny, misdemeanor larceny, misdemeanor manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter

, Court of Appeals , COA23-708 (Judge Jeff Carpenter) , Unpublished
State v. Morales

Driving While Impaired; Speeding; Allen Charge; Jury Instructions; No Error.

, Court of Appeals , COA23-901 (Judge Allegra Collins) , Unpublished
State v. Palmer

waiver of counsel; lesser included offenses

, Court of Appeals , COA22-915 (Judge Hunter Murphy) , Unpublished
State v. Price

Anders brief review, no meritorious issues, no prejudicial error

, Court of Appeals , COA23-949 (Judge April Wood) , Published
State v. Primm

Solicitation of a child by computer or other electronic device; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202.3(a); Knowingly solicited; Motion to dismiss; Substantial evidence; Contradictions and discrepancies are for the jury to resolve.

, Court of Appeals , COA23-966 (Judge John Arrowood) , Unpublished
State v. Rangel

PWC, Anders brief, petition for DNA testing

, Court of Appeals , COA23-564 (Judge Julee Flood) , Published
State v. Robinson

N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-534; N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-1431; right to a jury trial; right to be free from unreasonable seizures; secured bond; unsecured bond; modification of pretrial release conditions

, Court of Appeals , COA23-936 (Judge Jefferson Griffin) , Published
State v. Scott

Withdrawal of guilty plea; Handy factors; fair and just reason; petition for certiorari

, Court of Appeals , COA23-804 (Judge Tobias Hampson) , Unpublished
State v. Talley

motion to dismiss; larceny; conspiracy; sufficiency of evidence

, Court of Appeals , COA23-956 (Judge John Arrowood) , Unpublished
State v. Webster

plain error in jury instruction for constructive possession, failure to intervene ex mero motu in closing argument

, Court of Appeals , COA23-559 (Judge Allegra Collins) , Published
Sunshine v. Sunshine

alimony, depression of income, imputation of income, accustomed standard of living, savings

, Supreme Court , 403PA21 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
Bouvier v. Porter

Whether persons involved in the preparation and filing of election protests are entitled to the absolute privilege in a defamation action when they did not subsequently participate in the election protest hearing as a party, counsel, or witness.

, Supreme Court , 10A23 (Justice Phil Berger Jr.) , Published
Canteen v. Charlotte Metro Credit Union

Whether a unilateral amendment made pursuant to a change-of-terms provision violates the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and renders a contract illusory.

, Supreme Court , 89PA22 (Justice Anita Earls) , Published
Fearrington v. City of Greenville

Whether plaintiffs have taxpayer standing to challenge a city's red light camera program, and whether the framework used to fund that camera program violates Article IX, sec. 7 of North Carolina's Constitution.

, Supreme Court , 219A23 (Justice Allison Riggs) , Published
Hinman v. Cornett

Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment against parties asserting adverse possession where the claimants mistakenly believed they owned the disputed tract and the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to them did not show permissive use.