Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
33,453 Appellate Court Opinions
State v. Jones
motion to suppress, search directly related to supervision
State v. Kimble
false testimony; material and knowingly and intentionally used; credibility
State v. Long
failure to work after being paid NCGS § 14-104; preservation of motion to dismiss NCGS § 15A-1227; jury instructions vs. indictment; restitution
State v. Massey
State v. McDonald
Best Evidence Rule, Prior Conviction,ACIS Printout
State v. Miller
Discharge of firearm into vehicle; Sentencing error.
State v. Murdock
habitual felon indictment; separation of powers; findings of mitigating factors
State v. Murray
obtaining property by false pretenses; ineffective assistance of counsel
State v. Norris
Lay opinion testimony by law enforcement officer; plain error; use of prior inconsistent statement at trial; jury instruction on identity
State v. Palacios
controlled substances; trafficking in heroin; absence of quantity on verdict form; ambiguity of verdict; hearsay; confidential informant tip
State v. Rieger
Criminal court costs; meaning of in every criminal case in costs statute; statutory construction; costs not intended to be punitive
State v. Sides
Voluntary absence by intoxication; waiver of right to be present at trial; no error in failing to conduct competency hearing before proceeding with trial; no error in amending judgments to correct clerical error ex parte
State v. Taylor
State v. Thomas
Lay opinion testimony by law enforcement officer; co-conspirator exception to hearsay rule
State v. Thorne
Flight Instruction
State v. Tyrer
character evidence
State v. Vorheis
Motion to suppress; officer approach to car in empty parking lot late at night; consensual encounter or seizure
State v. Williams
First degree murder, attempted murder, competency, not guilty by reason of insanity, waiver to admit criminal acts
Yigzaw v. Asres
Child Support
High-Income
Chavez v. Wadlington
Dismissal of custody action for lack of standing; whether the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts both to prove a close relationship to child and to overcome defendants' protected status as natural parents.