Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
15,488 Appellate Court Opinions
Court of Appeals Published Opinions Filed September 7, 2021
Bradford v. Bradford
equitable distribution claim, motion in the cause, Rule 41
Bradford v. Bradford
equitable distribution claim, motion in the cause, Rule 41
Cohen v. Cont'l Motors, Inc.
Personal jurisdiction; Purposeful availment; Rule 12(b)(2)
Craig v. Neal
Dedication, appurtenant easement, private easement, right of way, public road, plat, Marketable Title Act, abandonment, adverse use, gravel road.
FMSH LLC v. NC Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.
Certificates of Need, Legacy Medical Care Facility, statutory construction, operate, acquire, reopen
In re: A.L.
3.1 juvenile case; jurisdiction; N.C. Gen. Stat. 7B-1001(a)(5)(a); permanency planning order
Isom v. Duncan
Custody order; parental visitation rights; best interests of the child.
Osborne v. Yadkin Valley Econ. Dev. Dist. Inc.
Negligence; duty of care; sexual assault; Title IX; Section 1983; substantive due process; equal protection; independent contractor; tort law; failure to train and supervise; precedent; education; special-needs; exceptional children; summary judgment; and motion to dismiss
State of NC v. Cube Yadkin Generation LLC
Declaratory Judgment Act, actual and justiciable controversy, public utility regulation, landlord/tenant exemption to regulation
State v. Flanagan
Revocation hearing; waiver of revocation hearing; jurisdiction; superior court; district court; N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 15A-1347; petition for writ of certiorari; N.C. R. App. P.4.
State v. Guerrero
Jury instructions, statutory mitigating factors, defendant's right to a jury trial
State v. Tarlton
Fatal variance, preservation, material element, surplusage
Supreme Court Opinions Filed August 27, 2021
In re A.C.
Appeal from order terminating respondent's parental rights; termination of respondent's parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1), neglect.
In re A.L.
Order terminating parental rights; whether the trial court's findings support its conclusion that grounds existed to terminate respondent's parental rights under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(2); whether the trial court complied with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
In re A.P.W.
Termination of parental rights; whether the trial court made sufficient findings to eliminate reunification from the permanent plan; whether DSS undertook reasonable efforts toward reunification; whether the evidence and the trial court's findings show respondent-mother willfully failed to pay a reasonable portion of the children's cost of care under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(3).
In re A.S.D.
Appeal from order terminating respondent's parental rights; termination of respondent's parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(2); willful failure to make reasonable progress.
In re D.M.
Order eliminating reunification from the children's permanent plan and subsequent order terminating father's parental rights for failure to make reasonable progress to correct the conditions which led to the removal of the children, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(2), are affirmed where competent evidence supports the findings of fact and the findings support the conclusions of law.
In re J.E.H.
Termination of parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1)-(3), (6); no-merit review pursuant to Rule 3.1(e) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.