notice of appeal; Appellate Rule 3(c)(1); computation of time

Summary Judgment; Worker's Compensation Act; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Willful, Wanton and Reckless Negligence.

Compensable injury; Parsons presumption; Competent evidence; Credibility; Weigh evidence; Form 63; Industrial commission; Burden of proof; Burden of production; Expert evidence; Expert testimony; Speculation.

equitable distribution; marital property; military pension; bankruptcy discharge; N.C.G.S. 50-19.1

Doctrine of sudden emergency; negligence; brake failure; static conditions; jury instructions; immediate action to avoid injury; prejudicial error; prudent man standard; substantial evidence; N.C. R. App. P. Rule 3(d) appellate review; unpreserved; interlocutory Order; final Judgment

Non-offending parent; Initial removal of child from custody of parent; Parent's paramount constitutional right to custody; Disposition hearing; Socioeconomic factors.

termination of parental rights; ICWA; active efforts;

interlocutory, substantial right, motion to dismiss, exclusivity provision, Workers' Compensation Act, arising out of employment, motion to stay, Fifth Amendment privilege

Confederate monuments; Rule 12(b)(1); Rule 12(b)(6); standing

Motion to suppress; Warrantless blood draw; Exigent circumstances; Motion to dismiss; Totality of the circumstances; Appreciable impairment; Aggravated felony serious injury by vehicle; Impaired driving; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-141.4; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-138.1.

felonious speeding to elude arrest; motion to dismiss; substantial evidence; reasonable opportunity to observe speed.

motion to suppress; scope of cross-examination; waiver; invited error

Governmental immunity, personal jurisdiction, four procedural postures, full evidentiary hearing, proprietary or governmental mission or purpose of employee, mission or purpose determined by duty assigned

A motion for a DRO after entry of a distribution award is not barred by the statute of limitations on actions upon judgments; Domestic relations order; Qualified domestic relations order; IRA; ERISA; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-20.1; Equitable distribution order; Statute of Limitations; Post-judgment order.

Whether the trial court erred in holding that N.C.G.S. 13-1, the statute providing for the restoration of voting rights to eligible felons, violates the Equal Protection Clause, the Property Qualifications Clause, and the Free Elections Clause of the North Carolina Constitution.

Whether an easement granting Duke Energy an interest in Lake Norman vested Duke Energy with the right to permit third-party homeowners to build structures over and into the submerged easement property and use the waters for recreational purposes.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that a settlement agreement was ambiguous and by reversing the trial court's summary judgment order.

On petition for rehearing, whether the three-judge panel properly applied this Court's standards from Harper I in assessing the General Assembly's remedial redistricting plans and, more fundamentally, whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable under the North Carolina Constitution.