Appellate Court Opinions

Slip opinions (court's decision in a case) filed and written by the justices of the Supreme Court or judges of the Court of Appeals

Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.

2,631 Appellate Court Opinions

, Supreme Court , 505A11 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v Barrow

When defendant was charged with first-degree murder, whether the trial court erred in also instructing the jury on second-degree murder; prejudicial effect of testimony from one of several expert witnesses; prejudicial effect of the trial court's failure to give the full pattern jury instruction on determination of aggravating factors

, Supreme Court , 175PA11 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v Beckelheimer

Admissibility of prior acts testimony against defendant under Evidence Rule 404(b)

, Supreme Court , 456A11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v Bradshaw

Sufficiency of evidence that defendant constructively possessed contraband found in a bedroom with indicia of domain present.

, Supreme Court , 385A11 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
State v King

Whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding expert testimony about repressed memory theory under Rule of Evidence 403

, Supreme Court , 524PA11 (Justice Sarah Parker) , Published
State v Moore

Admission of police officer's testimony that defendant exercised his Miranda right to remain silent; plain error review

, Supreme Court , 523A11 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v Otto

Motion to suppress evidence of DWI; whether one of the trial court's findings of fact was supported by substantial, competent evidence; whether police had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant's vehicle

, Supreme Court , 401A11 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
State v Salinas

Whether, after concluding that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in granting defendant's motion to suppress, the Court of Appeals should have: (i) remanded the case to the trial court to reevaluate the evidence pursuant to the correct standard; or (ii) reversed the erroneous order without remand

, Supreme Court , 472A11 (Justice Sarah Parker) , Published
State v Sweat

Application of corpus delicti rule to defendant's extrajudicial confession and conviction for four counts of sexual offense with a child; erroneous jury instructions

, Supreme Court , 121PA11 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
State v Towe

Whether expert testimony that a child had been sexually abused was properly admitted at trial; plain error review.

, Supreme Court , 384A11 (Justice Sarah Parker) , Published
State v Williams

Denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence; whether there was reasonable suspicion to extend defendant's detention beyond the scope of an otherwise valid traffic stop

, Supreme Court , 283PA11 (Justice Patricia Timmons-Goodson) , Published
In re P.D.R.

Application of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242 to a waiver of counsel inquiry in a termination of parental rights hearing

, Supreme Court , 333PA11 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v Joe

Whether trial court erred in granting defendant's pretrial motions to suppress and to dismiss the charge of resisting a public officer; and resulting in the dismissal of all charges against defendant

, Supreme Court , 100PA11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v Lawrence

Whether the trial court committed plain error by erroneously instructing the jury on conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon when it gave proper instructions on attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon.

, Supreme Court , 386PA10 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
State v Lewis

On retrial; admissibility of evidence presented at defendant's MAR hearing following his first trial on the same charges; whether defendant should have been allowed to cross-examine the victim about her identification of him and a codefendant as perpetrators of the alleged crimes; whether the trial court should have barred introduction of evidence about the weapon purportedly used by defendant; whether the Court of Appeals erred in ordering dismissal of all charges

, Supreme Court , 471A11 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re Totten

Review of recommendation for judicial censure