Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
2,650 Appellate Court Opinions
Alvarez v. Coastal Cmtys. at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc.
Action against developers and other parties for alleged fraudulent sales of undeveloped lots; whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appraiser and bank defendants from the suit under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
Anderson v. Coastal Cmtys. at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc.
Action against developers and other parties for alleged fraudulent sales of undeveloped lots; whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appraiser and bank defendants from the suit under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club and Plantation, Inc.
Action against developers and other parties for alleged fraudulent sales of undeveloped lots; whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appraiser and bank defendants from the suit under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
Barry v. Ocean Isle Palms, Inc.
Action against developers and other parties for fraudulent sales of undeveloped lots; whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appraiser and bank defendants from the suit under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
BB&T v. Peacock Farm, Inc.
Interlocutory appeal from trial court's grant of summary judgment for bank; whether the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the appeal.
Beadnell v. Coastal Cmtys. at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc.
Action against developers and other parties for fraudulent sales of undeveloped lots; whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appraiser and bank defendants from the suit under N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
Dickson v. Rucho
On remand; application of U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1257 (2015), to this Court's prior decision affirming the 2011 N.C. Congressional, Senate, and House redistricting plans.
Needham v. Price
Appeal from summary judgment for defendant on children's tort claims against him; whether the parent-child immunity doctrine shields defendant from claims based on gross negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
State v. Augustine
Petition for writ of certiorari to review order granting respondents' motions for appropriate relief under N.C.G.S. 15A-2010 to -2012 (2009) and N.C.G.S. 15A-2010 to -2012 (2011 & Supp. 2012).
State v. Hamilton
Whether the trial court committed reversible error in its jury instructions on attempted voluntary manslaughter.
State v. Huckelba
Whether the trial court committed plain error by erroneously instructing the jury on the elements of possession of a weapon on campus.
State v. Leak
Whether the Fourth Amendment, in light of Rodriguez v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015), permits a police officer to run a driver's license check on a motorist when there is no reasonable suspicion that any criminal activity has occurred.
State v. McCrary
Whether exigent circumstances justified a warrantless blood draw from an obviously impaired defendant charged with DWI; whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss all charges.
State v. Robinson
Petition for writ of certiorari to review order granting respondent's motion for appropriate relief under N.C.G.S. 15A-2010 to -2012 (2009).
State v. Winkler
Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for conspiracy to traffic in opium by transportation.
Wetherington v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Safety
Whether the Highway Patrol had just cause to terminate a trooper from employment for violating the Patrol's policy on truthfulness.
Supreme Court Opinions Filed November 6, 2015
Byrd, et al. v Franklin County
Whether a county zoning ordinance prohibits landowners from operating a commercial shooting range on their property.
In re: Judge James T. Hill
Review of recommendation for public reprimand.
Lassiter, ex rel. v North Carolina Baptist Hospitals, Incorporated, et al.
Whether defendants were entitled to an award of certain fees paid in connection with the deposing of plaintiff's designated expert witnesses pursuant to N.C.G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(d), despite the fact that the witnesses in question did not testify pursuant to a subpoena.