Appellate Court Opinions

Slip opinions (court's decision in a case) filed and written by the justices of the Supreme Court or judges of the Court of Appeals

Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.

2,650 Appellate Court Opinions

, Supreme Court , 68A20 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re A.K.O. & A.S.O.

Termination of parental rights; whether the trial court abused its discretion by concluding that terminating respondents' parental rights was in the best interests of the juveniles.

, Supreme Court , 153A20 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
In re A.L.S. and M.A.W.

Appeal from an order terminating respondent-mother's parental rights; whether the evidence supports the trial court's findings of fact and whether the findings of fact support the conclusion that respondent-mother's parental rights in the juveniles should be terminated pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(6) (2019).

, Supreme Court , 67A20 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
In re A.M.O.

Termination of parental rights; best interests; abuse of discretion standard of review; parent-child bond not a bar to termination.

, Supreme Court , 208A20 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re A.P.

Termination of parental rights; no-merit brief.

, Supreme Court , 11A20 (Justice Cheri Beasley) , Published
In re B.E., J.E.

Termination of parental rights; probability of repetition of neglect under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1); preservation of issues for appeal pursuant to N.C. R. App. P. 10(a)(1); juvenile's opposition to adoption not controlling of trial court's best interests determination under N.C.G.S. 7B-1110(a).

, Supreme Court , 188A20 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re C.A.H.

Whether the trial court erred in adjudicating grounds to terminate respondent's parental rights under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(7).

, Supreme Court , 339A19 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
In re D.M., M.M., D.M.

Appeal from orders terminating respondent-father and respondent-mother's parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1) and (2) (2019); whether the evidence supports the findings of fact and whether the findings support the conclusion that respondents' parental rights in the children should be terminated pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1).

, Supreme Court , 92A20 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re J.S., J.S., J.S.

Termination of parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1), (7), (9); No-merit review pursuant to Rule 3.1(e) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

, Supreme Court , 27A20 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re K.D.C. and A.N.C.

Appeal from orders terminating respondent-mother's parental rights; termination of respondent-mother's parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1), (2), (6); neglect; failure to make reasonable progress; dependency.

, Supreme Court , 451A19 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
In re K.P.-S.T. and B.T.-F.T.

Termination of parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1) and (2); failure to make substantial progress as indicator of likelihood of future neglect.

, Supreme Court , 54A20 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
In re N.K.

Appeal from order terminating parental rights; whether the trial court abused its discretion in not conducting a competency inquiry to determine whether respondent-mother was entitled to appointment of a guardian ad litem; whether poverty and respondent-mother's mental health excused neglect as grounds for termination; whether the trial court erred in failing to consider poverty, respondent-mother's mental health, or dispositional alternatives at the dispositional stage; whether the trial court complied with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act before terminating parental rights.

, Supreme Court , 59A20 (Justice Mark Davis) , Published
In re Q.B.

Appeal from an order terminating parental rights; whether the trial court abused its discretion by not conducting a second competency inquiry and appointing respondent a guardian ad litem under Rule 17.

, Supreme Court , 122A20 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
In re R.L.D.

Appeal from orders terminating respondent's parental rights; termination of respondent's parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1), (6), (7); neglect; dependency; willful abandonment.

, Supreme Court , 88A20 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re T.N.C., D.M.C.

Termination of parental rights under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1)-(2); whether respondent-mother's trial counsel provided ineffective assistance.

, Supreme Court , 41A20 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re Z.O.G.-I.

Whether the trial court erred in adjudicating grounds to terminate respondent's parental rights under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(2); whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining termination was in the juvenile's best interests.

, Supreme Court , 271A18 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Stein

Whether the Utilities Commission possessed the authority pursuant to N.C.G.S. 62-133(d) to authorize the earning of a return upon deferred operating expenses; whether N.C.G.S. 62-133.13, pertaining to unlawful discharges from coal ash basins to the surface waters of the State, bars recovery of the costs at issue; and whether an increase in the residential Basic Facilities Charge was unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence pursuant to N.C.G.S. 62-94(b)(5) or unreasonably discriminatory.

, Supreme Court , 401A18 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Stein

Whether the Utilities Commission possessed the authority pursuant to N.C.G.S. 62-133(d) to authorize the earning of a return upon deferred operating expenses; whether N.C.G.S. 62-133.13, pertaining to unlawful discharges from coal ash basins to the surface waters of the State, bars recovery of the costs at issue; and whether an increase in the residential Basic Facilities Charge was unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence pursuant to N.C.G.S. 62-94(b)(5) or unreasonably discriminatory.

, Supreme Court , 369A19 (Justice Cheri Beasley) , Published
In re A.H.F.S.

Termination of parental rights pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1)-(2) (2019); whether the trial court abused its discretion by concluding that terminating respondents' parental rights was in the best interests of the juveniles.