State v. Whittington

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when a witness who did not conduct tests identifying a substance as opium testified to the results of an analysis done by a nontestifying chemist; application of the waiver provisions of N.C.G.S. ? 90-95(g)

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when a witness who did not conduct tests identifying a substance as opium testified to the results of an analysis done by a nontestifying chemist; application of the waiver provisions of N.C.G.S. ? 90-95(g)